Trump Admin Announces New Dietary Guidelines



 The administration of President Donald Trump on Wednesday announced a new slate of dietary guidelines that recommends Americans eat more protein and less sugar than previously advised and that consumers avoid highly processed foods to achieve a healthy diet.

The guidelines are the latest product of the Trump administration's "Make America Healthy Again" agenda, named for the social movement that backs Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

He and other officials, including Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins, have implemented MAHA policy goals such as curbing childhood vaccines and restricting access to unhealthy foods for people receiving food ‍stamps.

Kennedy and Rollins had pledged to simplify the guidelines and remove what they described as the undue influence of food companies over their recommendations.

The guidelines are ‍published every five years by the Department of Health and Human Services and the Department of Agriculture.

Want to live to 100? DON’T turn vegetarian: Meat eaters are more likely to hit the milestone

Many often drink and even smoke!

Scientists say that eating meat could be the secret to living to 100, as a study shows that vegetarians are less likely to reach this milestone age. Pictured: Ethel Caterham, from Surrey, the oldest living person in the UK

Scientists say that eating meat could be the secret to living to 100, as a study shows that vegetarians are less likely to reach this age. Pictured: Ethel Caterham, from Surrey, the oldest living person in the UK

 Vegan and vegetarian diets might seem like the healthy choice, but scientists now say that avoiding meat could scupper your chances of reaching 100.

According to a major Chinese study, meat eaters are actually more likely to reach the milestone age than their plant-eating counterparts.

Even after accounting for factors like exercise and smoking, people who cut meat out of their diet were 19 per cent less likely to make it to 100 compared to omnivores. 

This trend was the most pronounced among vegans, who are a staggering 29 per cent less likely to become centenarians. 

Vegetarians, who still eat eggs and dairy, were only slightly more likely to make it to 100, with their odds being 14 per cent worse than those of meat eaters.

Even trendy pescetarian diets, which include fish, were linked with reduced odds of reaching 100.

The researchers suggest that these stark differences could be because older people need more nutrients than vegetarian diets can provide.

Lead author Dr Xiang Gao, of Fudan University, says: 'Our study suggests that in adults aged 80 years and older, a diet including both plant and animal-derived foods may better support survival to 100 years than a strictly vegetarian pattern, especially for those who are underweight.' 


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-15441571/Vegetarians-unlikely-reach-100-study.html


God’s Menu: The Biblical Diet and Why It’s Still the Healthiest Way to Eat

 

Why Go Back to the Bible for Food Wisdom

In an age of fad diets, superfood crazes, and contradictory nutrition advice, the Bible offers something refreshingly timeless: a way of eating rooted in creation, balance, and purpose.

The biblical diet is not simply about avoiding certain foods or following a list of rules, it’s about aligning our body, mind, and spirit with God’s design for nourishment. It is grounded in Scripture, validated by modern nutritional science, and supported by psychology and NLP as a framework for lasting change.

The foods God prescribed, and the manner in which He instructed us to eat — promote optimal health, mental clarity, emotional stability, and spiritual strength.

The Biblical Foundation of Eating. Read More>>>>>>

FDA approves daily pill to treat low libido in women after menopause: What to know

 

  • On December 15, 2025, the U.S. FDA approved Addyi (flibanserin) for the treatment of hypoactive sexual desire disorder (HSDD) in postmenopausal women under the age of 65.
  • Addyi was previously approved in 2015 for the treatment of HSDD in premenopausal women.
  • Past research shows that between 40-55% of people advancing through menopause experience low sexual desire, and about 9% of postmenopausal women have HSDD. 

On December 15, 2025, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the medication Addyi (flibanserin)Trusted Source for the treatment of hypoactive sexual desire disorder (HSDD) in postmenopausal women under the age of 65.

Addyi was previously approved in 2015 for the treatment of HSDD in premenopausal women. Premenopause or “before” menopause refers to the reproductive time in a cisgender woman’s life when they have regular menstrual cycles

Postmenopause refers to the time period after the person finishes menopause and no longer has a menstrual cycle. The majority of people start menopause between the ages of 49 and 52Trusted Source

While people can experience HSDD at any age, it is not uncommon to experience a low libido during menopause and postmenopause. Past research shows that between 40-55% of womenadvancing through menopause experience low sexual desire, and about 9% of postmenopausal women have HSDD. 

With the expanded approval to postmenopausal women under 65, Medical News Today spoke with three women’s health experts to find out more about how Addyi works, its side effects, what does this approval mean for menopausal women, and any non-medication alternatives they suggest for low libido.


REA MORE>>>>>>

Longevity: Here's how coffee may benefit healthy aging

 


  • Recent studies have highlighted the potential health benefits of coffee, particularly its influence on longevity and reducing chronic disease risk.
  • A study suggests that consuming 3 to 4 cups of coffee daily could increase lifespan and may add 5 extra years of life.
  • A recent review also indicates that 3 to 5 cups of coffee a day could decrease mortality and lower the risk of some diseases.
  • A third piece of research further suggests the health benefits of drinking coffee, especially in women as they get older.

Coffee is among the world’s most popular beverages, with more than 2 billion cups of coffee consumed daily worldwide.

Roughly two-thirds of American adults drink coffee each day, with the average American coffee drinker consuming 3 cups per day.

Given the high consumption levels of coffee, ongoing research is investigating the health consequences of coffee intake. As well as being a favored drink, coffee consumption may also provide numerous health benefits, possibly reducing mortality and lowering disease risk.

Healthy aging refers to the process of maintaining physical, mental, and social well-being throughout life. It typically involves focusing on preventative care and making healthy lifestyle choices, such as being mindful of one’s dietary pattern. 

While more research is still necessary, growing evidence is highlighting how coffee consumption may contribute to healthy aging

Medical News Today looks at three recent studies we have covered to offer an overview on the role of coffee and how it may benefit healthy aging.

Read More>>>>>

Can GLP-1s actually help treat Alzheimer's? Latest trial data

 



Novo Nordisk has announced the cessation of the Evoke trials, looking at whether GLP-1 drugs could help tackle Alzheimer’s. Image credit: NurPhoto/Getty Images
  • Pharmaceutical giant Novo Nordisk recently conducted a large-scale study investigating whether weight-loss drug semaglutide could slow Alzheimer’s progression.
  • Unfortunately, the study was unsuccessful, and the trial was halted early.
  • However, although more research is needed, the results are not entirely negative.

GLP-1 agonists have taken the pharmaceutical world by storm. The active ingredient, semaglutide, is used in the now-famous Ozempic and Wegovy medications for diabetes and weight loss.

Already, these drugs have helped millions of people manage their weight and treat type 2 diabetes. 

But could they also help tackle Alzheimer’s disease? Recent clinical trials focused on one of Novo Nordisk’s older diabetes medications called Rybelsus.

Because ongoing efforts to slow the progression of Alzheimer’s have largely been disappointing, even a minor success would provide a rare glimmer of hope for people in the early stages of the condition.

Read More.  >>>>>>

The surprising fatty food linked to a lower risk of dementia

 Dementia is an umbrella term for Alzheimer's, vascular dementia, and other conditions, and it affects more than 7.2 million Americans (stock)

Dementia is an umbrella term for Alzheimer's, vascular dementia, and other conditions, and it affects more than 7.2 million Americans (stock)

Scientists have uncovered a link between eating hefty servings of high-fat cream and cheese and a reduced risk of dementia.

In a 25-year study that included food diaries and interviews with more than 27,000 Swedes, researchers found that eating at least 50 grams of full-fat cheese per day and at least 20 grams of full-fat cream per day were correlated with lower dementia risk.

Dementia, an umbrella term that encompasses Alzheimer’s, vascular dementia and several other types afflicts more than 7.2 million Americans, though that rate could be higher.

MORE>>>>>>>>>>

Getting Less Than 7 Hours Of Sleep Linked To Shorter Life Expectancy Across America

 

Longevity Regardless of Income or Location

In A Nutshell

  • Sleeping fewer than seven hours per night is linked to shorter life expectancy across all 3,000+ U.S. counties studied, regardless of income level, healthcare access, or urban versus rural location.
  • Sleep insufficiency ranked as the second-strongest predictor of reduced life expectancy after smoking when examining county-level data from 2019 to 2025, ahead of physical inactivity and diabetes.
  • Neighboring counties can show vastly different sleep patterns and corresponding life expectancy gaps of several years, revealing potential targets for local public health interventions.
  • The relationship between inadequate sleep and mortality remained consistent across all years studied, including during the COVID-19 pandemic, and held true even when researchers controlled for obesity, smoking, and other major health factors.

RFK Jr Plans Overhaul of Child Vaccine Schedule: Report.

 Raheem Kassam – NationalPulse.com

PULSE POINTS



❓WHAT HAPPENED: A panel appointed by Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is reportedly preparing to recommend changes to vaccination schedules, including delaying the hepatitis B vaccine for newborns.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: RFK Jr., the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) vaccine advisory panel, and American children.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The CDC panel meeting is scheduled for December 4 over two days, with discussions and a vote on the hepatitis B vaccine recommendation.

💬KEY QUOTE: “Hepatitis B is sexually transmitted. There’s no reason to give a baby that’s almost just born hepatitis B. So I would say wait till the baby is 12 years old and formed and take hepatitis B.” – President Donald J. Trump.

🎯IMPACT: The changes will be a relief to many young parents who feel that too many vaccines are pushed on infants and young children too early in life.

IN FULL

An advisory committee appointed by Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is expected to propose major revisions to U.S. childhood vaccination schedules, including the possibility of postponing the hepatitis B shot normally given to newborns. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) vaccine advisory group is set to debate and vote on the recommendations during a two-day meeting beginning December 4.

Kennedy, who has been a prominent critic of federal vaccination policies, previously dismissed the entire 17-member CDC advisory panel and replaced it with less establishment figures, including several well-known vaccine skeptics.

President Donald J. Trump endorsed delaying the hepatitis B vaccine for babies earlier this year, saying, “Hepatitis B is sexually transmitted. There’s no reason to give a baby that’s almost just born hepatitis B. So I would say wait till the baby is 12 years old and formed, and take hepatitis B.”

The upcoming debate is unfolding alongside Kennedy’s broader effort to reshape federal vaccine policy. Since taking office, he has repeatedly questioned the safety of several childhood and COVID-19 vaccines. He has also argued that a possible link between vaccines and autism has not been “debunked,” stressing: “The claim ‘vaccines do not cause autism’ is not an evidence-based claim because studies have not ruled out the possibility that infant vaccines cause autism.”

READ MORE>>>>

Microplastics

 Tammy L Barney

As the world grapples with mountains of discarded plastic, scientists are turning their attention from the visible waste to something far more insidious: microplastics—tiny plastic fragments less than 5 mm in size. Emerging research suggests that infants and young children may be particularly vulnerable to these particles, and the health implications are only beginning to surface. They come from lots of sources: breakdown of larger plastic items, synthetic clothing fibers, packaging and containers, bottled water, even household dust and indoor air. Evidence shows these particles are entering the human body: in food, water, air, and then potentially in the gut, lungs, even the bloodstream and organs.



Microplastics originate in two main ways: either manufactured at small size (microbeads used in cosmetics, for example), or broken down from larger plastic items through weathering, UV exposure, and mechanical abrasion.

Young children may be exposed to microplastics via several pathways:

  • Ingestion of contaminated food or water, including infant formula or drinks stored in plastic bottles.
  • Inhalation of airborne microplastics (for example, household dust or tiny plastic fibres) — children especially breathe more air per body weight and spend much time near floors and surfaces where dust accumulates. 
  • Placental transfer: microplastics have been found in human placentas, signalling possible in-utero exposure. 
  • Use of plastic toys, pacifiers, bottles, and other baby gear that may shed tiny plastic particles. 

In short: our youngest and smallest are in the front line of exposure.

There are a number of reasons to believe little ones are more vulnerable:

  • Development matters. In early life, organs and systems (immune, nervous, endocrine) are developing rapidly, making them more sensitive to disruptions. 
  • Relative exposure: Some analyses suggest that infants may ingest or inhale much higher volumes of microplastics per body weight compared to adults. For example, one report claimed babies have “over 10 times higher rates” of microplastics in their feces than adults.
  • Longer lifetime: Early exposure means a longer life ahead for any effects — so even small insults early could drive effects years down the road. 

A review of infants’ exposure concluded that microplastics show up in baby formula, breast milk, infant feces, and suggest that feeding bottles and toys may be sources. Studies link in-utero microplastic exposure (via marine/airborne pathways) to higher probability of low birth weight. One large global‐birth-dataset found that a doubling of exposure increased the low birth-weight hazard by 0.37 per 1,000 births. Laboratory and toxicology work shows microplastics may cause oxidative stress, immune disruption, changes in gene expression and cell damage—mechanisms that raise red flags for human health.

Best ways to reduce exposure + support yours body and babies bodies

Minimize new exposure by Using filtered tap water rather than single-use plastic bottled water when possible. Many bottled waters show higher microplastic counts. 

Avoid heating food in plastic containers (microwaving plastic can release microplastics and associated chemicals). Choose clothing and textiles made of natural fibers (cotton, linen, hemp) instead of synthetic materials which shed microfibers. In your home, reduce dust and indoor plastic particulate exposure — e.g., use air filters, HEPA vacuums, wash synthetic fabrics less aggressively. 

Rid Yourselves of these plastics!

High-fiber diet: Fiber helps promote good bowel motility and can bind substances in the gut, potentially reducing absorption of unwanted particles.according to- Ohio State

Also

  • Stay well-hydrated, use good water quality — helps kidneys, gut transit, and supports excretion.
  • Healthy liver support and overall good nutrition: The liver metabolizes many foreign substances; having good nutrition, healthy fats, vegetables/cruciferous veggies helps.
  • Regular exercise and sweating: While not a proven “microplastic flush”, supporting circulation, lymph, skin health may help overall body clearance mechanisms. Sauna’s, 20 minutes a day over 125F helps shed plastics. Some studies show a 65% reduction of plastics in organs within just 3 months!  Ohio State Health
  • Antioxidants, anti-inflammatory diet: Since microplastics may cause oxidative stress/inflammation, a diet rich in colorful fruits/veggies, omega-3s, etc. can help mitigate harm. REMEMBER Healthy food is medicine to the body!

What your action plan could look like

Putting it together, here’s a simple “microplastics awareness” plan you can try:

  1. Swap out your plastic water bottle for a stainless-steel or glass one.
  2. Check your food storage: avoid microwaving in plastic, use glass/steel.
  3. In your wardrobe: pick at least 1-2 items a month in natural fibers, and wash synthetic garments less often.
  4. Increase daily fiber (vegetables, legumes, whole grains) and drink plenty of good-quality water.
  5. Move your body — regular walks, workouts, sweating somewhat.
  6. Once a week do a “plastic audit” at home: what plastics did I use today? Could I swap it?
  7. And finally: stay informed. The Plain Truth’s Your Health Today is a great place to find articles on your health and God’s diet to wellness!

By taking steps to reduce exposure, you not only reduce your microplastic burden potentially, but you also are improving other health dimensions (better diet, less plastic chemical exposure, cleaner environment) — win-win.

How a DNA test solved a medical mystery – and revealed a doctor’s decades of deception

 

Summer McKesson struggled to breathe for years. Doctors told her it was because her blood would not stop clotting – and they couldn’t figure out why.

A single clot alone can be lethal; but the recurring and unexplained clots that formed in McKesson’s heart and lungs were a medical mystery.

After multiple surgeries to remove clots and scar tissue, McKesson traveled to the Mayo Clinic, where she sat in a conference room while renowned physicians and specialists worked through her case on a whiteboard.

But even they were baffled.

“To hear that even they had never seen it before,” she told CNN through tears, “I came back (home) just crushed at that point.”

Desperate for answers, McKesson said she turned to 23andMe, hoping the DNA analysis service, which claims to offer insights into its clients’ genetic health history, might unlock some clues to her condition.

But her quest for answers would unearth a family secret – and a doctor’s decades-old deception that has ensnared multiple families across the country.

Ask your parents about Dr. Peete

McKesson never questioned her genetics – or considered 23andMe – until a team of surgeons performed an urgent, open-heart procedure in 2022 to remove clots from her heart and lungs.

As she recovered, McKesson said her surgeon dropped another bomb.

While operating, he’d noticed the connective tissue that supports her organs was stretchy and unusually fragile. He told her the complication – coupled with McKesson’s willowy build and Amazonian height – could be a sign of an inherited disorder called Marfan syndrome.

His suspicions were correct. A geneticist confirmed McKesson’s diagnosis, and said her clotting disorder was also genetic, which ushered in a host of lifelong health challenges.

Her heart would now need to be constantly monitored, and she will eventually need at least one more major heart surgery.

But the diagnosis was puzzling for another reason: both of her conditions are genetic and, as far as she knew, no one else in her family had them.

Summer McKesson recovering from surgery - Courtesy Summer McKesson
Summer McKesson recovering from surgery - Courtesy Summer McKesson
Summer McKesson post surgery scar - Courtesy Summer McKesson
Summer McKesson post surgery scar - Courtesy Summer McKesson

McKesson, 43, said she didn’t have a full picture of her family’s health history because her father died when she was a teenager. So, she signed up for 23andMe, submitted a DNA sample, and waited.

The results arrived in her inbox in October 2023.

“I was just sitting on my couch after work, and kind of quickly pulled up the results on my phone,” McKesson recalled. At first, she said, she was curious to learn more about her family’s ethnic background.

“Growing up, I always was like … ‘I don’t look like any of y’all. No one has my nose. I’m a foot taller than everyone,’” she said, adding her family used to joke that she was adopted.

While there weren’t many surprises in her family’s ancestry, McKesson said when she navigated to the “family members” section of the site, she drew up short:

The test showed she had seven half-siblings.

“I just remember being shocked and my mind just swirling,” she said. “I’m like, how is this possible? … Did my dad have another family or something?”

Was she actually adopted? None of what she was learning made sense.

She sent screenshots of the results to a trusted group of friends, and they discussed different theories. Then, later that night, she sent a message to her newly discovered half-siblings through the 23andMe website.

“Humor has really gotten me through a lot of this,” McKesson said, so she opted for a lighter tone in her first note.

She sent the same message to each name listed on the site. And then, she waited. It would take more than a month for anyone to respond.

“I don’t want to cause any conflict,” one of them finally wrote, “but if you want to dig into this, I’d ask your parents if they went to see Dr. Peete.”

A doctor’s decades of deception

Chelsea Bailey, CNN

In 1980, Laurie Kruppa and her husband, Doug, found themselves waiting for a fertility specialist named Dr. Charles Peete in a sterile exam room at Duke University Hospital.

The couple wanted children, Laurie told CNN, but Doug had a vasectomy during a previous marriage, so her OB-GYN referred them to the physicians at Duke for fertility treatment.

The 1980s and ‘90s would prove to be a time of innovation in the fields of genetics and assisted reproductive technology. In 1978, a woman gave birth to a baby named Louise in the United Kingdom through in vitro fertilization, or IVF, making her the first child to be born through the novel procedure.

But the Kruppas opted to use intrauterine insemination, or IUI, a procedure that had been around in some form for centuries but had only recently become common thanks to advances in freezing and banking sperm.

CONTINUE READING>>>>

Florida Sounds Alarm Over Plot to Spread Deadly Meat Allergy Among Public to ‘Fight Climate Change’

 Frank Bergman - slaynews.com

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is image-54-1024x538.png

Florida Governor Ron DeSantis is raising the alarm after uncovering a chilling globalist plot to spread a fatal meat allergy among the general public to supposedly “fight climate change.”

DeSantis has denounced what he calls a “deranged” global agenda to genetically engineer people to develop a red meat allergy.

The Republican governor linked the plan to the World Economic Forum (WEF) and United Nations (UN), both of which are pushing to eliminate traditional diets and control the food supply in the name of “saving the planet.”

DeSantis’s comments came after resurfaced footage showed a New York University bioethicist proposing that humans could be intentionally engineered to become allergic to meat to reduce consumption and fight climate change.

“Genetically engineering humans to become allergic to meat because some elites think people eat ‘too much’ of it is insane,” DeSantis posted on X.

“Human Engineering” to End Meat Consumption

In the 2016 video, Dr. Matthew Liao, director of the NYU Center for Bioethics, told a live audience that ticks could be used to induce an allergy to red meat.

This same idea is echoed by other global bioethicists.

“People eat too much meat,” Liao said.

“And if they were to cut down on their consumption of meat, then it would actually really help the planet.”

READ MORE>>>>